| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to <strong>One Duck's Opinion Forums</strong>.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>! |
|
Moderator: WJUK


Finally, we have a Download Station at out fingertips!


...you know, just in case someone out there still give half a crap.






Fish seem a little more rare, though, and catching them seems to have become more difficult somehow.



ryanrab1 wrote:PsychoDuck wrote:I don't think there's anything wrong with what I wrote, personally. Anyone else feel like chiming in on this?
Believe me more rare really is wrong.

PsychoDuck wrote:ryanrab1 wrote:PsychoDuck wrote:I don't think there's anything wrong with what I wrote, personally. Anyone else feel like chiming in on this?
Believe me more rare really is wrong.
Uh, really? That's the first I've ever heard of it.


ryanrab1 wrote:Under the "Animal Crossing: City Folk impressions" article you had:Fish seem a little more rare, though, and catching them seems to have become more difficult somehow.
It should be:
Fish seem a little rarer, though, and catching them seems to have become more difficult somehow.
(as a side not instead of more difficult you could have put much more difficult which I think makes the sentence flow a little better).


camieman10 wrote:ryanrab1 wrote:Under the "Animal Crossing: City Folk impressions" article you had:Fish seem a little more rare, though, and catching them seems to have become more difficult somehow.
It should be:
Fish seem a little rarer, though, and catching them seems to have become more difficult somehow.
(as a side not instead of more difficult you could have put much more difficult which I think makes the sentence flow a little better).
On the rare thing you are right, but the ironic thing is that you have a typo in your post pointing out his. The bolded, "not" should be "note," <(also add this comma). On the issue with "more difficult", it's fine how it is, unless he wanted to stress that it is A LOT more difficult than last time, in which case he could put "much more difficult."


As you can see, I only included Christmas-related images. I didn't due this to exclude other religions...


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests